COMPARISON
Notemark vs Ruttl
Per-user pricing, or a flat Solo plan.
Ruttl lets reviewers comment on live websites and suggest edits right on the page, and it also covers mobile apps, PDFs and images. Notemark stays on websites and puts its effort into the handoff: trackers, Slack and coding agents over MCP.
The short verdict
Pick Ruttl if you also review mobile apps, PDFs and images, or want reviewers to try edits on the page. Pick Notemark if your work is websites and the feedback has to reach Linear, Jira, GitHub or a coding agent, on a flat Solo plan instead of per user pricing.
Pick Notemark if
- You want Linear, GitHub, GitLab or Notion, not only Slack, Trello, Asana and Jira.
- Your coding agent should read and resolve feedback over MCP.
- You want more than 10 comments on the free plan.
Where Notemark wins
Ruttl lists the same support as Notemark on every feature it documents. The difference comes down to fit.
Not listed by Ruttl
Ruttl does not mention these on its public pages. Notemark has them today.
Screenshot fallback
Pages behind a login or heavy single-page apps switch to a full-page screenshot at 1440 by 900.
MCP server for coding agents
Claude Code, Cursor and other MCP editors read and resolve comments. Solo and Team.
Where Ruttl fits
Ruttl is the better pick in these cases.
- You also review mobile apps, PDFs and images.
- Reviewers want to try copy and style edits right on the page.
- You want a built-in kanban board for triage.
Both Notemark and Ruttl cover
- Comments on the live site
- Guest review without signup
- Device viewports
- Tracker and chat integrations
- Free plan
Feature by feature
Every Ruttl cell comes from Ruttl's own pages, checked 2026-10-29.
| Feature | Notemark | Ruttl |
|---|---|---|
| Comments on the live site | YesPaste a URL. Reviewers pin comments on the live page, and each canvas keeps a snapshot of what they saw. | YesComment directly on live websites, and suggest edits on the page. |
| Guest review without signup | YesReviewers type a display name and start commenting. Unlimited guests on every plan. | YesGuests comment without signing up. The pricing page lists the free plan's guest limit two different ways. |
| Screenshot fallback | YesPages behind a login or heavy single-page apps switch to a full-page screenshot at 1440 by 900. | Not listed publicly |
| Device viewports | YesPhone, tablet and desktop presets, plus custom sizes. | Yes15 device sizes on Pro and Business. |
| Tracker and chat integrations | YesSlack, Linear, Jira, Asana, GitHub, GitLab, Notion and ClickUp from Solo. Webhooks on Team. | YesSlack, Trello, Asana and Jira. ClickUp on Pro and Business. |
| MCP server for coding agents | YesClaude Code, Cursor and other MCP editors read and resolve comments. Solo and Team. | Not listed publicly |
| Browser extension | PartlyBuilt for Chrome, Edge and other Chromium browsers. Not in the Chrome Web Store yet. | Not listed publicly |
| Free plan | Yes1 project, 3 active canvases and unlimited guests. | Yes1 project, 5 pages and 10 comments. |
| Pricing model | Plans by team sizeSolo is one member at a flat price. Team includes 3 members, then $5 per extra member each month. | Per userPriced per user per month. Business is quoted. |
| Lowest paid plan | $14.99 per month, billed monthly | $18 per user per month, billed monthly |
Questions before you choose
Is Notemark a good alternative to Ruttl?
Yes, if your reviews are on websites and your fixes live in a tracker or an editor. Notemark sends pins to Linear, Jira, GitHub, GitLab and more, and coding agents read them over MCP. Ruttl covers more formats, including mobile apps and PDFs.
How does Ruttl pricing compare with Notemark?
Ruttl Pro is $18 per user per month, billed monthly, so cost grows with the team. Notemark Solo is $14.99 per month, billed monthly for one member, and Team includes 3 members before any per-seat charge. Both have a free plan.
Do clients need an account to leave feedback?
Not with either tool. Ruttl guests comment without signing up. Notemark reviewers type a display name and start commenting.
Sources
Every Ruttl claim on this page comes from these public pages, read on 2026-10-29.
- ruttl.com/website-feedback-toolChecked 2026-10-29
- ruttl.com/pricingChecked 2026-10-29
- ruttl.comChecked 2026-10-29